🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have voted to withdraw from an international accord created to safeguard women from abuse, including family violence, following extensive and heated debates in the parliament.

Several thousand of demonstrators assembled in Riga this past week to voice disagreement with the vote. The ultimate authority now lies with President the nation's president, who must determine whether to approve or veto the proposed law.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only took effect in the Baltic state last year, mandating governments to develop laws and support services to eliminate all types of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the first EU country to initiate the procedure of exiting from the convention. The transcontinental nation pulled out in 2021, a decision that rights groups described as a major setback for gender equality.

Ideological Debate and Opposition

The international agreement was ratified by the EU in last year, yet conservative factions have argued that its focus on equal rights undermines family values and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers decided 56 to 32 to withdraw from the treaty, a move proposed by political opponents but backed by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a setback for moderate conservative Prime Minister the nation's PM, who joined demonstrators outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that violence does not triumph," she stated to the assembly.

Political Divisions and Reactions

One of the main parties advocating for the exit is a nationalist party, whose leader has urged the public to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

The nation's ombudswoman the rights official appealed for the treaty not to be politicized, while the organization Equality Now asserted it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it served as a tool to realize them".

The Thursday's vote has sparked widespread outcry both inside Latvia and abroad.

22,000 individuals have signed a national appeal demanding the treaty to be preserved. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has announced a protest for the coming week, charging MPs of ignoring the will of the nation's citizens.

Global Worries and Possible Next Steps

The head of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly stated that Latvia had made a hasty decision driven by misinformation. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and deeply concerning regression for female equality and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation left the treaty in 2021, instances of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not achieve a supermajority majority, the head of state could possibly send back the bill for further consideration if he holds concerns.

Head of State Rinkevics stated on social media that he would evaluate the vote according to legal principles, "considering governmental and judicial considerations, instead of ideological or political viewpoints".

Recently, another component of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, indicated it would not rule out appealing to the supreme judicial body.

"This decision represents a worrisome situation for gender equality not only in Latvia but throughout Europe," stated a human rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been increasing in several EU nations
• The Istanbul Convention mandates specific legal protections for survivors of gender-based violence
• The nation's decision could influence similar discussions in additional EU countries